Quantcast
Channel: The Abode of McThag
Viewing all 13074 articles
Browse latest View live

Flag Waving

$
0
0
If I wave a Confederate Battle Flag, what am I saying?

Think hard about that.

The reason I say you should think hard on that is very rarely are the people waving or displaying these flags being asked what they are saying.

We sure are hearing from the people who've decided that waving said flag can only mean racism.  They communicate that anyone who says they're displaying that flag for reasons other than racism is lying about their motivations.

Good footing to start on.  "You there, lying racist!"

I've mentioned before that symbols are mutable.

It means that any symbol's meaning is very subjective.

Because there's a large group of people who find this flag racist, I'd normal say, "let's be polite about it and take them down." The problem with the being polite "solution" is the Confederate Battle Flag is just the latest in the "everything is racism if you're white" parade.

I've mentioned this sort of thing before.  Somebody wants a race war.  I don't think it will end like they think.

We're rapidly getting to the point where not being a racist is no longer a defense to the charge of being a racist.  I am a racist because I am white is a racist accusation!

It will just be assumed that I am lying about it and I will be punished as if I had been a racist all along.

The most disturbing thing about the accusation of lying is that the reason it sticks.  They've made telling the truth criminal in some cases and career ending in others (just ask Brendan Eich).  It makes lying about your true thoughts and positions a matter of self defense!  What we're getting is worse than racism and thought police.  We're getting our freedom to peacefully object to political policy removed bit by bit.

Legal participation in the political process, as is your right as an American citizen is now grounds for termination should your political position be in opposition to... to...  it can be anything.  No it can't be anything, it's always the position of one side in these debates that causes it.

Compare the treatment of Brendan Eich to that of Irene Gallo in the social justice war camps to see what I mean.

Edit to add:


The Stakes

$
0
0
In my flag waving post...

What happened to Brendan Eich is exactly the wrong way to handle political disagreement.

What was announced is that if you disagree with the winners in a particular political issue on your own time with your own money your livelihood is at risk.

He was forced to resign for backing the losing side in the gay marriage debate.

Did he preach at work?  No.

Did he change any policies at Mozilla to make it unfriendly to homosexuals?  No.

He donated money in the course of peaceful political discourse.

And was excoriated for it when the donation list was made public.

I am unsatisfied about the circumstances surrounding the release of that list.

But knowing that your political donations can be made public and your donations to any given cause can be used as grounds for termination?  It's known as having a chilling effect on such donations.

As I am sure the people who leaked that list were well aware of.

Mount Soledad

$
0
0
I've posted from time to time on this thing.

Today I find that it's still going on!

When I last looked there was an order to destroy it.

Now we're back to stays and appeals and the Feds selling the land to the people who tried to buy it from San Diego but couldn't because the ACLU has decided that this cross WILL be destroyed.

If it's not on government land, there's no legal way to force that so the sale to a private owner must be blocked.

What a fucking waste of money and effort.

Bad Form

$
0
0
Some has-been actor has said, "I am sorry that you took the racist thing I said at face value as racism. I will now explain that what I meant is not the plain, racist, meaning of what I said. In the course of the explanation it will become clear that I am not actually sorry and did, indeed, mean the racist thing I said at face value. It will also become clear that I am actually sorry people are upset that I am a racist rather than being sorry about being a racist."

I am getting so very sick of these non-apologies.

I Am Now Obamacovered!

$
0
0
Got my information packet and booklet explaining what the VA will cover.

I skimmed it.

Can't wait to start the tedious process to get my disability reassessed again.

Thanks for erasing all those records you fucking prick!

Designing a system that takes years to navigate and closing all unresolved cases older than a year?

How can I tell this was a government program?

Even more fun was learning that if I'd had a higher percentage, the reassessments were nearly automatic.

Have I ever mentioned that there's not a reputable lawyer I've spoken to who will represent me?

Because I have the honor of serving between the end of Vietnam and before the beginning of Gulf War I (Post Grenada and Panama too).

This also means no VFW, American Legion, etc...  All the heavyweight veterans orgs don't give two shits about Cold War Vets either (at least they sound sorry about their charters forbidding it).

I'd prolly not be near so bitter about it, but I know more than a couple "Vietnam Era" vets who did the exact same things as I did in Germany and came as close as I did to Vietnam while enlisted.  But the VA rolls over backwards and they're allowed to join up with the VFW.

Doomed

$
0
0
This just in, the F4F-2, widely deployed by our Naval forces in the Pacific Theater are unable to out maneuver Japanese A6M-5 aircraft in flight regimes that favor the enemy aircraft.

We are completely doomed in this theater and should sue for peace immediately as there is no hope whatsoever to attain any aerial victories against these nimble and untouchable foes.

Combined with the virtual eradication of Chennault's Flying Tigers there is no reason to continue to fight against the Imperial Juggernaut.

Or maybe an F-16D-40 beating an F-35A pre-production plane when specifically testing particular flight regimes and envelopes to explore the idea of changing the flight control laws isn't the end of the world?

Not Legally Binding Document

$
0
0
In Congress, July 4, 1776. [239 years ago]

The unanimous Declaration of the united States of America,

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.

He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:

For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing taxes on us without our consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:

For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:

For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:

For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:

For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

New Hampshire: Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts: John Hancock, Samual Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island: Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut: Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York: William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey: Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania: Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware: Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland: Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia: George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina: William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina: Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia: Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton




[Type this thing in manually sometime instead of copy pasting it. The stuff we put up with on a daily basis would have the founders shooting already. Any time someone calls you intolerant, remember we're tolerating far more than they were in 1776 and they literally called their suffering "the intolerable acts"!]

This is yet another day that's not about veterans (dead or alive) or soldiers. Those are Memorial Day, Veteran's Day and Armed Forces Day (respectively). Today is also not Flag Day, despite the prominent red-white-and-blue bunting.

Set off some fireworks, burn some questionable meat and reflect on what we've lost and could regain.

Never forget what those men signing that document were risking, and many of them gave nearly all.

Tapped

$
0
0
The universe can sense when you're tapped out.

Budgeted for my vacation to Indiana.

Saved for a whole year.

Went on vacation and spent the money.

Hard drive crapped out on the main machine!

Luckily, and happily, it was in a RAID mirror!

No data lost, yet.  Both drives were same make, model and bought at the same time.  So the remaining drive might be on very borrowed time.

Fingers crossed that it lasts a bit!

Seagate Sucks

$
0
0
Or so I am told by every review I've read in my quest to replace a failed Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 drive.

My history with Seagate...

The failed drive was made on 09Sep08.  As was its partner.

The drive that came with the computer is a 320gb  Barracuda 7200.10; made on 22May08.

The oldest drive I still use regularly is a 250gb Barracuda 7200.9 made on 02May06!  This is the Bootcamp'd Win7 Ultimate/64 drive I use to run my flight sims.

All in all I've had good luck with Seagate.

My original Bootcamp drive that ran WinXP Pro still lives in an external enclosure as spare data storage.  It's a Western Digital Green Power made on 20Jan09.

I've a stack of old IDE drives that probably still work too.

Is Life Is No Getting Out Alive

$
0
0
The ending of the Firecracker 250Firecracker 400Firecracker Medal of Honor 400Pepsi Firecracker 400Pepsi 400Coke-Zero 400 Powered by Coca-Colalast night this morning had a pretty spectacular crash where the Three Car driven flown by Austin Dillon got up into the fencing that's there to keep the car from continuing up into the bleachers.

The fencing did its job, but some debris still made it into the stands and some people were injured, none seriously and only one taken to the hospital.

But over at FoxNews...  A video speculating about whether the fans can sue NASCAR over this.  Perhaps.  But the real thrust of the piece is all about how things need to be made 100% safe for the fans.  Probability 1.0 safe.  Impossible for a fan to be injured safe.

I'll bet they'd approve a meteor defense system...

The thing is, despite the injuries sustained last night, you're a lot more likely to get hurt in the stands falling while trying to save your beer from spilling when you were watching the race while walking instead of where you were putting your feet.  And at $8 for 12 oz. of Budweiser, by The GAWDS you are GOING to save that beer!

It's more dangerous leaving the track to head home than it is sitting in the stands!

The current talking-head-press for safety definitely forgets that people used to die when shit went wrong at the races.  It wasn't even very long ago, really.  NASCAR has been proactive about making things safer and is constantly working on it, and they talk about it all the time.

So piss off FoxNews commentators.  You probably had to google every proper noun you used in your commentary.

Dear Slate

$
0
0
You are morons.

In essence you're saying, "this is successful in marketing beer to its intended audience, you must stop doing it because people who are outside that demographic may become offended."

This is akin to demanding that My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic be taken off the air because it's known to offend middle-aged bikers through the existence of Bronies.  Hasbro will cater to nine-year-old girls and Bronies with MLP:FiP, but will ignore the offence to bikers because the bikers typically don't buy the product.

The target demographic for the "offensive" beers isn't people who would get offended at the off-color humor.

The real message in the article is, "why don't they make a beer that caters to MEEEEEEEEEEE?" Actually, someone probably does...  I remember the white cans with the black "BEER" label.

Here's something I can say with reasonable certainty.  I am the housewife in my household, The Lovely Harvey is the "man" of the house with the job.  What I get to do is hang out with the other wives at work social functions while the men talk shop.  Guess how many of those girls are drinking beer.  Go on.

Me and maybe one other (not 32%).  Wine is the preferred drink of the person who's most likely to be offended by these "sexist" labels followed closely by sweet cocktails (or is it sexist to say cock now when referring to mixed drinks?).

If I go to these women you're apparently trying to shelter with your demand for more sensitive beer names, I think you're going to find they're going to laugh at both the humor on the labels and you for thinking those names are so offensive they need to be removed from the market.

Something else that bears mentioning is the women I know who drink beer, aren't the same sort of women who drink wine.  Entirely different mindset about lots of things.  Humor included.

I think what we have here is the brewers understanding their market better than a writer at Slate and catering to it, rather than worrying that they're missing 1/3 of their market from that pandering.

We don't really need to go too far here in the blogs.  Tam is a beer drinker, we could ask her if she's offended.  Tomorrow I'm going to a local nano-brewery and I can put it to both the owner and the beer-drinking female portion of the customers.

Offensive Beer

$
0
0
Took a poll at the local brewery.

Nobody, including a local pastor, was actually offended by any of the offensive beer names presented in the Slate article, and many went looking for more off-color names to laugh about.

The clientele at Escape is about 40% female and the feeling I get from their responses was that the names could certainly be offensive if you were looking to be offended.

About what I figured.

So many "offensive" things just really aren't out in contact with normal people it seems.

How's That Gonna Work Again

$
0
0
A guy in Germany hid a Panther tank in his cellar for close 40 years.

This was after driving it around the neighborhood in the late '70's so it's not like nobody knew he'd had the thing.

So if someone in Germany can hide a tank for near 40 years, explain to me again how a handgun ban is going to work.

I really wanna know now.

Pristine

$
0
0
It is clear that I don't shoot enough.

Not a single one of my guns has become all beat to shit by me.

The guns that I have that are in that condition came to me in that condition.  I call it 'character' on my old milsurps.

My carry guns are starting to show signs of being carried.  They'd show more, but I had an extended period of changing out guns (and holsters) trying to find the combination I preferred.

I also had my carry permit for quite a while before I actually carried much at all.  Part of the problem was that I had two handguns at the time.  A Glock 21 and an ancient H&R "Automatic" revolver I'd inherited from my grandfather.

The Glock is a big handgun.  Too big for comfortable carry for me IWB and Florida doesn't lend itself to wearing enough for concealed on the belt.

Never mind that my car has very narrow seats and the seatbelt latch sits right where the gun wants to be.  There's plenty of space on the left side, oddly enough, making me think about cross-draw holsters, which I notice there aren't many.

I've gravitated to pocket carry and shoulder holsters (when it's cool enough).  Pockets have a definite size limit.

Pocket carry has also put the most wear on my carry guns.  It's a pretty harsh environment in there.

Fundraiser

$
0
0
Clear your calendars!

Sunday 19 July 2015.  1pm to 4pm at Painting with a Twist...

http://www.paintingwithatwist.com/events/viewevent.aspx?eventID=306486

Passcode is: APPLE to RSVP.

This helps fund The Boy's school, so come out and paint some happy little trees!

If you can't make it, but wish to donate in a non-tax-deductable way; stab the paypal link to the right and I'll forward it to the school.

Icky Reason I Don't IWB

$
0
0

That puckered scar is from a boil that got out of hand.  The main part of it is about an inch wide, with scarring going out another half inch surrounding.

I actually did almost die from this because the staph infection got into my bloodstream.  Nasty shit.

Well, if I carry inside the waistband, the holster puts a lot of pressure on this spot.  Short little guns, like my J-Frame, end right about on top of the scar and really dig in.

It's still tender, three years later.

This Is Tam's Fault

$
0
0

I am glad I had the DVD on hand, otherwise she'd have cost me money wanting to rewatch it.

Hot Lazy Summer Day

$
0
0
With scattered thunderstorms so going for a cruise with the top off is problematic.

It's the sort of day where I really feel like doing something, but can't be arsed to actually do it.

Damned hard-drives ate the shooting budget for a while too.

My Gawd It's Full Of Nerds

$
0
0
Trying to explain what a comic/sci-fi convention is to The Lovely Harvey...

"Imagine a gun show, except full of nerds."

She didn't run screaming, at least.

She's intrigued enough we might go to the Tampa Comicon or to Necronomicon.

If she has fun, perhaps even Dragon Con where the big dollars are pissed away.

Dragon Con is harder to dial in because The Boy might have State Special Olympics the same weekend.

Balls

$
0
0
Dear Republican Party.

Stop running candidates.

Don't even bother.

The fucking speaker of the house doesn't even have the balls to just drop the mic and walk off when the press decides to change the subject of a scheduled press conference.

Lemme help you for next time, Boehner.

Say what you have to say.  When they don't ask questions about what you just said, just read the whole speech back to them.  Keep doing that until they talk about what you came to talk about or you get bored.

Stop treating them as if they weren't your opponents and you might find your job is a shit load more fun.  Act like they hate you, always have and always will, because they do hate you.

Republican Party?  Until you get that last message and stop caring if the press likes you, you're not going to ever get anything done.

But I think you already know that, and what the Democrats want is what you want...

Which brings me back to my second and third line above.
Viewing all 13074 articles
Browse latest View live