Quantcast
Channel: The Abode of McThag
Viewing all 13071 articles
Browse latest View live

Damaging My Brain So You Don't Have To

$
0
0
For some stupid reason, probably brain damage, I clicked on a link for "The 12 Dumbest [Dancing Monkeys]"

The basis for judging them stupid is based on a single quote given at each picture of the dancing monkey in question in a slide show format, 3 clicks per monkey.

If saying one stupid thing makes you dumb, we're all fucking morons.

The related links included a "12 Smartest [Dancing Monkeys]" list.

Same basis for smart, a single quote.  But what makes a dancing monkey smart is repeating some liberal talking point.

Feline Induced Typos

$
0
0
When you have an unweaned kitten clinging to your chest, it affects your typing accuracy.


I Can't Breathe!

Na Na Na NERD

I Am Disappoint

$
0
0
X Wing and TIE Fighter identify the throttle as the sole joystick and there's no way to change it.

If I unplug my HOTAS and leave the stick plugged in, it might work, but that's a major pain in the rear the way things are set up.

Grumble.

Pupdate

$
0
0

Talk about fast recovery!  The sore on his face has closed!

Happy dance!

One more week of antibiotics and we should be done for good.

No Strings

$
0
0


Perhaps the best thing about Disney buying Marvel is that they can include "No Strings" running disjointed in the background of the trailer.  It's super appropriate and would be impossible for, say, Universal to do.

PLUS!  The look on Thor's face when Rogers shifts the Mjölnir slightly.

And a geek-out moment for this Champions player who specialized in characters who wore powered suits, Hulk-Buster (mod 14) vs Hulk!

It's The Climate That Does It

$
0
0
That, and the infernal distances.

Space is big.

One can harp on the topic endlessly and still not impact any understanding on someone.

It's mind boggling.

For example:

Let's make a scale model of the Milky Way.  The Sun will be the size of a grain of sand in our model.

How big is our model?

Hope you have a big back yard, because at this scale the Milky Way is the size of our Solar System!

Distance starts having a massive time component to it.

It's about eight minutes to The Sun from here at the speed of light (1 AU ≈ 8 light minutes).  Jupiter is 36 to 52 light minutes from Earth (depending on the time of their years) one way.  Conversations are kind of hard at this scale.

Atomic Rockets makes a lot of salient points about detection.  It's damn near impossible to hide a manned ship in a solar system.  They're just too damn bright-hot in several easily seen frequencies.  Where Atomic Rockets goes wrong is forgetting resolution.  The longer the wavelength, the larger your aperture needs to be for a given resolution.  A comfortable 24˚ C is very bright in infrared against the backdrop of space, but you need a really big aperture to see more than a dot.  Knowing it's there from the dot is one thing and the temperature range tells us it's likely manned.  Is that enough to start shooting at it?

Atomic Rockets does a good job of explaining that you can detect a manned ship out at Jupiter's orbit readily.  Remember that time component?  You're detecting something 36 to 52 minutes ago.  That's a long time.

A Traveller missile is only good for 50,000 miles from the launcher before it loses its command guidance.  This distance is mostly dictated by the time delays of the laser commanding the missile and how stale the location information on the target is, a 1/4 second distance, which is a 1/2 second stale at maximum range which is actually a lot of delay.  An M6 ship can be more than 7m from where you think it is in that time.  That can be the margin of missing.

Of note is a standard TL10 missile pulls 6g for an hour.  That's a "mere" 473,997.7 mph and the thing weighs 300 lb. (convert that to mass how you will).  However, it will have travelled 236,998.9 miles (almost to the moon, Alice!) (1.27 light-seconds) in that hour.  Based on the limitations of the laser command guidance, much of the delta-v of the missile must be for lateral movement to intercept the target rather than to merely build speed.

An autonomous missile could go a lot farther and its targeting delay gets shorter not longer as it approaches the target.  The trick is the terminal stage since to get to any appreciable range in a timely manner you need a lot velocity (GURPS TL12 Traveller missiles have 55g! for a short spurt).  More velocity means it's not as easy to make corrections and the staler your information is the farther off your initial vector can be.

Something that Atomic Rockets tends to get wrong is stealth and decoys.  The object is not to escape detection, it's to escape the terminal phase of missile guidance.

Remember that whole aperture size and resolution thing?  The same rules apply to collimating a laser.  The farther you want to shoot, the larger your mirror/lens diameter has to be for a given frequency.  Again, as information about the target's location gets staler, the likelihood you missed goes up.  The shorter the wavelength, the smaller you can make the mirror/lens, GURPS Traveller says they're ultraviolet at TL8+ and X-Ray from TL-10+ with some frequency adjustment becoming available at TL9.  Ranges are modest, a mere 17,000 mile 1/2 damage range for a standard TL10 turreted laser.  These ranges have a lot more to do with how tightly you can focus a beam than how far light will travel.  It's a simple equation that I forgot to write down and can't find the wonderful tutorial I learned on anymore.  Perhaps FuzzyGeff with his tasty chess club brain will be along with it.

The same sort of thing is happening with particle weapons (plasma, fusion, particle beam and meson) too.  Of course the details of how these weapons work is hand-wavium...

240!

$
0
0
What is three times eighty?

Three Eighty.

.380!

Get it?

I'm here all night, try the veal.

Willard suggested a .380 day.

Out came The Lovely Harvey's SIG P232, my Colt 1908 Pocket Hammerless and SIG P238.  They were joined by Willard's Beretta Cheetah 85FS, Biakal IJ-70 (a .380 Makarov), and Colt Mustang Plus II.

Pics denied because someone was in a hurry to get home. GRIN.

Edit to add:

The most accurate are the super tiny sights of the Pocket Hammerless.  The P232 reminded me why I sold mine, it hits the web of my thumb wrongly.  Most pleasant by far to shoot is the Beretta, but it's nearly a full sized service pistol.

How Is It That He Had The Gun In The First Place?

$
0
0
Jose Canseco, felon.

The 1968 gun control act makes it illegal for a felon to have a gun to shoot off their own finger.

Why aren't we reading about Mr Canseco's arrest for felon in possession?


SaaaaaaLUTE

$
0
0
Things you just never expect to see.

Bitching Betty is a real person, Kim Crow, and she's on IMDB.

She has a sense of humor too.

For the hoary old Falcon 4.0 someone tracked her down and got her to record additional material.

"Bingo fuel" was changed to, "There was a plane that had no gas and Bingo was its name-o."

I wish I'd downloaded the sound file and waded into the hex-editing to insert it.

Of All The Things

$
0
0
Trying to write a post about getting detection ranges right in space and figuring out resolutions of sensors...

What breaks my brain?

Converting between pico, nano and micro meters.

Wavelength

$
0
0
Back on the dead horse of sensors in space.

Most of our familiar sensors are next to useless in space because their in a frequency optimized for punching through atmosphere.  Long wavelengths are less bent by it so they work at longer ranges.

Even microwave is longer wavelength than visible and IR.

In space long range sensors are going to trend towards passive and because it's much less cluttered out there and computers are getting so much better it's going to become possible to use the visible spectrum, or even ultraviolet.

Resolution is STILL going to be an issue.

For example, the 2.4m diameter optical scope in the Hubble can't resolve something the size of a Type S at Luna distances.  It can't see smaller than 0.000000193 rad and a 36.4m long Type S is 0.0000000947 rad that far out using the best case wavelength of 380nm (nearly UV violet).

For the record, you need on the order of a 5m aperture to see a Type S at lunar distances in violet and 10m in red...  So a 10m scope to see a Type S in the full visible spectrum at 1.28 light seconds.

Radar is our normal go-to for long range sensing here on earth.  That's normally X-band or 2.5-3.75 cm for wavelength.  To resolve our Type S orbiting with the moon you need a staggeringly huge 330km diameter radar dish!  As is mentioned in the comments, an interferometer is a means of creating a larger aperture with smaller individual units.  This is great for fixed and orbital installations, but not so great for shipboard use.  Such is taken to extremes with the canon Long Baseline Observation Window.

To see it at the maximum range of our missile command laser, though, you just need a 70km array.  This is why LIDAR in visible or shorter wavelengths will supplant radar in Traveller.  A green LIDAR only needs a 1.5m lens.  GURPS:Traveler TL10 PESA goes into UV where just a 300 cm lens can see out that far.  The AESA can see three times as far, out to 240,000km so a 1m aperture is required.  The TL12 sensors use higher frequencies for their extended ranges.

A Note To Manufacturers

$
0
0
If you want me to wear a hat or shirt with your logo, gimme one when I buy your product.

Why?

Because it's advertising.  Budget it that way.

Because it's advertising, you should be the one paying, not me.

You'd have to pay me to put a billboard on my property, this is no different.

Cold Snap

$
0
0
There's few things as amusing as listening to the snowbirds complain that they'd just left this "cold" weather.

It's right up there with the natives behaving like it's the apocalypse.

Yes, the high will be in the mid-60's.  Yes, the low might get to the thirties.

Complain to someone in Iowa!  Their "sympathy" might help keep you warm?

Focus Focus Focus

$
0
0
Lasers.

Light is bound by inflexible rules.

Luckily, GURPS:Traveller is kind of miracle tech.

The standard TL10 turreted laser is 250MJ and X-Ray in frequency.  The 1/2 range is listed as 17,000 miles with a max range of 51,000 miles.

Taking the mean of the frequencies (0.010 to 10 nm) a 1.5m lens gets us a 0.22m spot at 17,000 miles and a 0.67m spot at 51,000 miles.

We chose a 1.5m lens because most of the art-work shows a turret that's about 1.5m tall, so that's the largest lens we could honestly mount.

The discharge rate is one second, so our 250mJ is 250,000kW.

Our one second pulse puts 6,415.78 MW per square meter on the target at the 1/2 damage range.

That's a lot.  Enough to get through 4" of steel (DR 280).

Taking it out to max range...

We only have enough energy delivered to punch DR 33.  This is because we're putting the same energy over a larger area.

Oops, that's the TL10 turreted laser listed in GURPS: Traveller Starships.  The TL10 laser from GURPS: Traveller (main book) is 360 megajoule.  Its 1/2D range is 20,454 miles giving it a spot of 0.27m diameter.  It plunks 6,381.94 MW per square meter and can punch four inches of steel in a one second pulse.

As an aside, changing the diameter of the lens to 1m changes a lot.  For the 360 MJ unit that increases the spot size to 0.4m drops the beam intensity at the target to 2,836.42 MW per square meter and drops penetration to a mere 1.86" (130 DR).  The 250MJ laser spot increases to 0.33m in diameter and drops to 2,851.6 MW per square meter and a bare 1.87" of penetration (131 DR).  Those numbers tend to line up better with the listed DR for ships and their dice (6dx50(2) for the 360MJ and 5dx50(2) for the 250MJ), the real difference is the the 360 gets 3,454 more miles.

An Out

$
0
0
Lieutenant, why is private Johnson dead?

Well, Sargent, he didn't want to wake up, so I told him he could sleep when he was dead.  Then he shot himself.

Never give them a loophole, Sir.

Forbidden Books

$
0
0
A near as I can tell, I've never read a banned book.

I did read Huckleberry Finn before the retcon changing Nigger Jim to just Jim though.

Censoring is far worse than banning.

The reasoning as to why every instance of the word nigger (oh and we do no justice by dancing around it and saying n-word) was removed is that its very mention is so harmful that nobody should ever hear it or say it.

The people most harmed don't seem to have gotten the message, or noticed the mortal power of the word because they use it frequently in speech and song.

I will believe it does harm when the people claiming the harm stop doing the harm themselves.

The idea that people of one race are forbidden to use a word because it's a mortal insult while they are free to use it and when they do it's nothing...  That's racist.  If you can't see it as racism, you're probably a racist yourself.

That's the real problem, not a mere word.

Censor

$
0
0
The reason I'm bugged that the editing of Huckleberry Finn is we shouldn't remove controversy from children.  We should teach them about it.

So that they learn context.

Manners too.

While I use the full word when I'm making a point, I would not use it to someone's face to describe them.  That's rude.

But we should not shy away from using the words in question when talking about language and what's appropriate or not.

For a simple lesson just look up how arse and ass have phased in and out of being the polite phrasing of the other.

Missing Out

$
0
0
One of the things that sucks most about misophonia is not being able to listen to podcasts.

Because it's amateur radio hour, there's a lot of background noise to filter past.

Like whoever's playing with what sounds like a zip-tie the entire Squirrel Report... (It's probably a scroll wheel too close to the mic).

I can't listen to the talking because of the ziiiiiiiip, ziiiiiiiip, ziiiiiiiiip.  I hate it because it's clear that there's stuff I want to listen to and it sucks that I can't.

Heavy breathing and lip smacking noises are a close second and they show up in professional broadcasts too.

There's nothing to be done about it, just needed to vent.
Viewing all 13071 articles
Browse latest View live