If you pull up the graphics archive for Matthew, you'll see the prediction cone shifting.
You will also see that the actual position of the storm often misses the next predicted spot.
If they can't predict a weather pattern they've been studying in far more depth and with more lavish funding than even climate change for three whole days, how can we trust them with years and years?
You will also see that the actual position of the storm often misses the next predicted spot.
If they can't predict a weather pattern they've been studying in far more depth and with more lavish funding than even climate change for three whole days, how can we trust them with years and years?