The present debate about bathrooms is because of cowardice.
There's nobody brave enough to say that the division on the rooms is based on the user's plumbing and if you have an outie instead of an innie use Door A.
This boldly skips the entire gender identification debate and sidesteps the trap/quagmire of it.
Why does it take courage to actually say this?
Because the present trend from LGBT is to be raving fuckball punitive lunatics when they don't get their way.
We can also take it to it's "logical" conclusion... There was a person at gaming at ISU whom was a sexual offender because he took a piss in the woods and someone saw his penis. He'd be a child sex offender if the reporting mother had managed to get her daughter to say she'd seen it too.
Fine, girls with male plumbing; you wanna use the women's room, then you're subject to the above if someone sees your junk. Didn't think of that, did you?
Of course, you could help (for a change) and try to get that asinine set of laws changed. Seeing a penis taking a piss is not a sexual display by the pisser. Speaking of, ever notice that there never seems to be a man who's offended that a woman has to use impromptu facilities? We might as well declare beverages a sexual display because if someone drinks, they're going to be urinating.
I am fully aware that gender identity is a tough row to hoe.
The fights being picked by the LGBT community aren't opening doors, they're closing minds. It's petty shit and there will be a backlash.
In all of this tiresome debate something else stands out: Why are there two bathrooms in the first place? There must have been a reason. Even if it was a stupid reason, there once was one. I ask this because it's not mentioned. If the reason for dividing the bathrooms is no longer valid or appropriate, then why not address THAT?
Is it because bullies can't think rationally? I think so.
There's nobody brave enough to say that the division on the rooms is based on the user's plumbing and if you have an outie instead of an innie use Door A.
This boldly skips the entire gender identification debate and sidesteps the trap/quagmire of it.
Why does it take courage to actually say this?
Because the present trend from LGBT is to be raving fuckball punitive lunatics when they don't get their way.
We can also take it to it's "logical" conclusion... There was a person at gaming at ISU whom was a sexual offender because he took a piss in the woods and someone saw his penis. He'd be a child sex offender if the reporting mother had managed to get her daughter to say she'd seen it too.
Fine, girls with male plumbing; you wanna use the women's room, then you're subject to the above if someone sees your junk. Didn't think of that, did you?
Of course, you could help (for a change) and try to get that asinine set of laws changed. Seeing a penis taking a piss is not a sexual display by the pisser. Speaking of, ever notice that there never seems to be a man who's offended that a woman has to use impromptu facilities? We might as well declare beverages a sexual display because if someone drinks, they're going to be urinating.
I am fully aware that gender identity is a tough row to hoe.
The fights being picked by the LGBT community aren't opening doors, they're closing minds. It's petty shit and there will be a backlash.
In all of this tiresome debate something else stands out: Why are there two bathrooms in the first place? There must have been a reason. Even if it was a stupid reason, there once was one. I ask this because it's not mentioned. If the reason for dividing the bathrooms is no longer valid or appropriate, then why not address THAT?
Is it because bullies can't think rationally? I think so.