...of M&P and not drinking the Flavor-Aid of Glock.
I shoot them both the same, so value neutral. Though there's noticeable differences in how... The Glock seems to want to pull left and the M&P often gives tiny twitch right I notice when I'm dry-firing but not at the range.
Same number of shots.
Same sights now too.
I've found that I really like having the thumb safety. Preference thing. A clinging vestige of carrying a 1911, I guess.
I really really really like that I don't have to pull the trigger in battery on the M&P to take it apart. Starting the take-apart process with the slide locked to the rear is a valuable crutch for people like me.
Neither gun was made in America with Austria for Glock and Massachusetts SSR for the Smith.
The last reason to keep with the Smith is both Harvey and Marv shoot them too and have a much stronger preference than I do.
I shoot them both the same, so value neutral. Though there's noticeable differences in how... The Glock seems to want to pull left and the M&P often gives tiny twitch right I notice when I'm dry-firing but not at the range.
Same number of shots.
Same sights now too.
I've found that I really like having the thumb safety. Preference thing. A clinging vestige of carrying a 1911, I guess.
I really really really like that I don't have to pull the trigger in battery on the M&P to take it apart. Starting the take-apart process with the slide locked to the rear is a valuable crutch for people like me.
Neither gun was made in America with Austria for Glock and Massachusetts SSR for the Smith.
The last reason to keep with the Smith is both Harvey and Marv shoot them too and have a much stronger preference than I do.